I gave him 6 minutes but he had lost my interest after the first couple of minutes - his delivery was too pompous and his tone was too sarcastic for me to want to listen.
It’s the kind of arrogant, sarcastically mocking style you can get away with when preaching to the converted and slagging off those who disagree with you but I don’t think it’s the best style to adopt if you want to persuade folk who disagree with you to listen to your point of view.
In the bit I did listen to, he seemed to be claiming that he had waited until after the Queen’s funeral to raise a debate about the monarchy but was being told that it was disrespectful to talk about abolishing the monarchy so soon after the Queen’s death.
I am not sure if that claim is valid - I have heard plenty of people who objected to anti-monarchy comments during the late Queen’s funeral processions, lying-in-state and funeral services - but they only said it was disrespectful to do it during the period of national mourning.
In fact many of them made the comment that once the Queen’s funeral was over, those dissenters could dissent as much as they liked.
So, anti-monarchists can have at it now and complain about our constitutional monarchy as much they want.
They can beaver away, working out alternative options for a Head of State and draft up the costs and benefits, both short term and long term - they will also have to draft up a new constitution to replace the system of constitutional monarchy and all the legal procedures that go with it.
When they have some concrete proposals and costings to compare with what we have now, I’d be happy to read their full proposals - but I’m not wasting any more of my time listening to the rest of that sarcastic, condescending lecture on that video.