You’ve gone and got yourself confused between true statements and things that you find on youtube. Your base assumption, which is obviously wrong, is that not adulterating what is shown on the TV and then captured on youtube has any sort of veracity.
That is one problem. The other problem is that this is a chat forum. You are not chatting. You are not explaining your point of view or adding insight through debating with others. You are posting video clips - sorry, dull dull dull video clips. You are killing this thread by shutting down dialogue.
(Is that true Trump philosophy?)
3 Likes
That is exactly, what I was talking about. No evidence provided that the information is incorrect, As previously stated. Just making it clear that the information is indisputable. Just personnel opinions with out any research.
Nothing hurts more than undisputable information that is factual/truth.
He makes it hard to dispute.
CNN hosts just set with their mouths open when people inform them of their personal experiences.
This explains why news agencies work the way the do, which has a large impact on politics.
FMI
A good example of incompetence of any kind of leadership.
This was done by a moderator of the Vice President debate. This is the 3rd time the left media has been caught editing answers that politicians said.
Even with this kind reporting gets caught, people will believe the fake answer.
I wonder if anybody actually watches the clips? Personally I doubt it.
2 Likes
It’s out there, just in case anyone wants to be informed.
1 Like
I doubt it too.
Youtube is out there already with an easy search feature for anyone who wants to search for videos supporting their personal view.
You can find videos supporting every possible view on every possible topic.
Confirmation bias paradise.
Of course posting them on here is not discussion, it is just copy and paste.
1 Like
One can search clips that support Harris, but they are few and are between. And of those, it appears that the speaker was hit by nerve agent, with the twitching going on from cut and edited so many times.
This is about the US election 2024 antics, not about YouTube operations.
It appears those posts are about the US election antics. Just the truth/facts.
Look their back.
OK fair enough, so what did you think of the opinions expressed in the video America’s Last Election in post 1037?
Yes exactly…
Meant to be a discussion thread not a run of copy and pastes from youtube.
What do folk think of Elon Musk’s recent antic ?
Elon Musk has promised to give away $1m a day until the US election to someone who signs his online petition.
Musk is backing America PAC, a political group he set up to support Donald Trump’s bid for the White House.
He posted on X: "Every day, from now through Nov 5, @America PAC will be giving away $1M to someone in swing states who signed our petition to support free speech & the right to bear arms!
“We want to make sure that everyone in swing states hears about this and I suspect this will ensure they do.” “
Does this sound ethical to you?
Could name anything Trump has ever been involved with has been ethical? 
NOPE.
nothing Elon Musk has done has seemed ethical to me.
He is very similar to Trump in that regard.
2 Likes
Ms…July, remember, when a person makes the subject about you they are attempting to divert attention from the truth, and that is the mission of traitor Trump and his followers.It’s like when they (Trump supporters) tell you they want proof, and then argue against the proof. Traitor Don has already publicly stated what he intends to do (just like Hitler), and yet his supporters deny that which is already public record. One of my favorites is when traitor Don made a speech to the rioters on Jan 6 encouraging them on to the capital, and then he denies he incited the insurrection, even said he would march with them (then he disappeared to safety).
1 Like
Offer me a million to sign a petition for one of my rights, all I’m going to say is where do I sign.
The second question is why are the Democrats investigating something that is supporting a right?
When asking for a reputable source, and they have done this, they use a blog comment from a person that, true, has a right of freedom of speech.
Musk is promising to give $1 million each day to someone who signs his online petition, which reads: “The First and Second Amendments guarantee freedom of speech and the right to bear arms. By signing below, I am pledging my support for the First and Second Amendments.”
Jan 6 speech said “peacefully”
1 Like
I don’t really have an opinion on it. The only thing, it even states it’s a theory. Ok. Fine by me.
It is meant to be a discussion thread not a copy and paste replica of youtube.