Excuse me, isn’t this thread going off thread a little ???
Donkeyman!Yes it going off at a tangent in order to make it easy to victim blame .
Do you know why a female would rape a male?
What’s the psychology behind it, ?
Very complex,i wouldn’t have a clue.
Crikey…work for it, it should be given freely ,but as you say some woman like a bit of rough.
Liking a ‘bit of rough ‘is not rape .
It usually means a male partner who is not some smooth type
Eg A cowboy
It doesn’t mean they are rough or rape women .
If you have to work for it - what a repugnant phrase in this context you have got the wrong women who probably isn’t attracted to you .
Please desist from these accusations !
You neither know me nor have any evidence of that which you accuse me of .
Thats how it comes over .
I read, that a second post-mortem has taken place on Sarah as the first was inconclusive and her body is being released to her parents for her burial.
Her body was severely mutilated. They had to ID from dental records
Rape is always rape and no always means no. If people are playing rough sex games then they use a safe word which also means no.
Annie, l said ‘body’ as that’s how it was reported today. They are still waiting on results to ascertain how she died.
I was afraid that this might have been the case because a body would still be recognisable after 10 days .However I did not see this reported anywhere how terrible for her family .
There has been nothing in the media to say Sarah’s body was severely mutilated so far as I have read .
Sometimes identifying a decomposed body is difficult so by using dental records it’s the quick way to ascertain identity.
Recognised by whom?How do you recognise a naked female you have never seen ? Would you want her family to have to identify her in that state ? That’s why they use the dental records to identify such cases .
Surely the police would recognise her, as they were looking for her, they would have had pictures of her, wouldn’t they?
There is no, word of mutilation she was found in a bag.
Also able to identify her on what clothing she was wearing…not a certainty,but I’m sure the parents would have informed the police on what she was wearing, when she went missing…
If they id from dental records then it usually means the face is no longer recognisable. The report I heard made it sound as though it was maybe not in one piece.
She may not have been dressed. I know her mobile phone is missing. They have described “her remains” in reports. Rather than her body.
They have photos of her they know what they are looking for .
Remains!!..Oh Lord!!
Well the report that I heard was that they found her remains and identified her from dental records. That’s why I thought her body must have been mutilated. It wasn’t really long enough to decompose in a wooded area.