The fact remains that he won the election. Clinton would have been a global disaster. She didn’t have the nickname “Killary” for nothing.
And the fact remains Biden won both the popular vote and the electoral college votes in the 2020 election.
The only way that you could be correct is if hundreds and possibly thousands of individuals have conspired to remain totally silent. It’s akin to sticking to the conspiracy of the lunar landings.
You singularly refuse to accept that Trump lost, fair and square, because you think he’s great. Utterly delusional.
I rather doubt it. Late votes counted, postal irregularities, almost as notorious as the Gore / Bush fiasco in which finally the best guy won.
I’ll join you
Todger, you seem so adamant Trump won.
I don’t think it is fair to say that unless you counted the votes yourself.
So why do you think he did?
60 court challenges later… two phone calls - one to an investigator by Trump tantamount to obstruction of justice…
I assume you’ve forwarded your physical evidence/proof to Trump’s team? They deffo need it as nobody over in the US has managed to categorically unearth it yet.
It looks likely that he’ll be impeached. Let’s see what happens
Utterly deluded?
Quite possibly, but there are many millions sharing the same delusion so I’m not alone in that! Thousands remaining silent? But would any of them be aware they had been conned?
So not knowing what reason would they have to make a fuss? Oh wait, there’s a whole lot of real patriots who ARE making a fuss.
Did the present POTUS lose fair and square?
Millions of people, myself included, believe not. Do I think he’s great?
Hrm, I think that he’s a whole lot better for his MAGA objective that the Dems all seem to reject.
I think his actions where one growing section of the population is so active are absolutely correct.
I like the “cut of Trump’s jib”. I’ve worked with people who are similar in the way they think and act. I could do business with Trump any time / any place.
Biden and Kerry (who’s keeping very quiet at the moment)?
Not a snowballs chance in hell.
Don’t be ridiculous.
Counting votes is like pyramid Dex, initially hundreds of thousands of people are involved, but as the votes are grouped together and passed on to the next stage fewer and fewer people are involved, until the final summing up and overall result would be covered by just a few.
I’m not saying voting fraud has taken place, but most people involved in the counting would have no idea what has taken place further down the line.
[QUOTE=OldGreyFox;2016499
I’m not saying voting fraud
has taken place, but most people involved in the counting would have no idea what has taken place further down the line.
[/QUOTE]
…
So nobody, including you, among all these “millions” (where did you get that order of magnitude from:confused:?) has managed to identify nor unearth any hard, factual evidence that shows that Trump won?
None of the “evidence” that was presented to the courts (and dismissed) has been released for public scrutiny. Why not…after all, it might as well be if Trump wants the electorate to be fully aware? He has nothing to lose by publishing it now, and potentially everything to gain even at this stage if his claims have been demonstrably correct.
But you remain utterly convinced.
And you think that I’m being ridiculous:shock:
Ridicule is nothing to be scared of.
By your logic, for all we know, Trump’s final count might only have been a grand total of a few hundred thousand and not anywhere near the 70+ million.
If the purported spooks behind it all wanted no doubt, it would have been easy enough for them to have made his loss significantly huge, which people would have assumed might be a bit bent but nowhere close enough to suggest he won.
There is another possibility; that of postal voting.
It has, apparently, happened here where certain groups of people have been ‘persuaded’ to vote for someone.
With postal votes, if a community has a strong leader to whom his people look up and trust, and those voters are easily swayed because they don’t fully understand all the implications, it is quite easy for the community’s leader to ‘advise’ his people to vote for a certain candidate.
Moreover, the ‘personal touch’ of the leader being present to ‘assist’ the voters in ‘completing their forms correctly’ would ensure the ‘correct vote’ went through!
I’m sure that has happened here, so why shouldn’t it have happened in America?
The solution: stop all postal voting (and yes, I have one) with the exception of those who for physical reasons cannot attend a polling station in person.
Popularly known as mass delusion. 
What is a “real patriot”?
Why on earth do you care if your country is the UK?
That ship has sailed… 
I think we already had the discussion about nobody in the UK asking for ID or cards at polling stations when you come in person. Yet we don’t make a big fuss when the election is over.
It doesn’t matter how perfectly the system is run, Trump would never accept losing an election.