And what I am saying Senile is Spains past is in fact still its present.

What is white phosphorous as Israel accused of using it in Lebanon attacks
The deadly munitions can burn human flesh ‘through the bone’, says Human Rights Watch
And what I am saying Senile is Spains past is in fact still its present.
Reported by Al Jazeera following a reputed observation by the Islamic Health Committee. More fake news and certainly not another Dresden.
Is Spain having a civil war?
So you would prefer Iran, Russia, China and Fat Boy to march across a defenceless Europe, using most like nuclear hypersonic missiles, wiping it off the face of the earth? Thank God we have Trump, and thank God he has the support of Israel, perhaps one of the greatest races the world has produced.
Is Spain having a civil war?
When political polarization, Catalan separatist tensions, and economic challenges exist, the result is never civil.
So you think Trump is invading Iran because he cares about Europe?
So you think Trump is invading Iran because he cares about Europe?
Nope, same as 1939. When Europe falls, the USA is next.
Reported by Al Jazeera following a reputed observation by the Islamic Health Committee. More fake news and certainly not another Dresden.
Why would you immediately pick on Al Jazeera I wonder.
I’m not that selective …
I saw it on the Independent so take it that it is NOT fake news.

The deadly munitions can burn human flesh ‘through the bone’, says Human Rights Watch
Reading back on these last posts am I the only one wondering about the fixation with Spain?
The time distort back almost a century to WW2?
And what exactly the relevance is to Trump’s attacking Iran?
If we’re harking back to WW2 America only came in at the end.
Which is ironic considering Trump’s insults about the UK and Winston Churchill.
And let’s not forget prior to joining in the war … many American companies had lucrative contracts with their German counterparts helping Germany’s war effort
Nope, same as 1939. When Europe falls, the USA is next.
In 1939, if there had been a vote on it in the US, the voters would have been happy to let Hitler take the whole of Europe. Lindenberg and his pro-Germany stance was very popular. Getting involved in another war was not. So it is not true to say many people thought Hitler taking Europe was going to be a stepping stone to then taking the US. More like the thinking on both sides of the Atlantic was about regions of influence - the US have oversight over the Americas.
it’s reported today that Israel are unlawfully using white phosphorous in Lebanon
Ya, it’s reported ??? It is only illegal in certain circumstances and using it as a smoke screen it not one of the things that make it illegal.
And the ones reporting it as illegal were the same ones making false accusations before and not having a honest reputation.
Nope, same as 1939. When Europe falls, the USA is next.
how is the current situation in any way the same as 1939???
Ya, it’s reported ??? It is only illegal in certain circumstances and using it as a smoke screen it not one of the things that make it illegal.
Exactly … it’s illegal and has ben since 1980 to use against civilians. Which Israel are now doing.
And the ones reporting it as illegal were the same ones making false accusations before and not having a honest reputation.
Oh come off it … it’s an easy cop out to claim it’s fake news or question the honesty of those making the allegation …that is not debate, that is simply you denying something because it clashes with your opinion and bias.
am I the only one wondering about the fixation with Spain?
no, it appears that some posters here feel the need to support everything Trump says whether or not it makes any sense. If he retracts it later then there’s silence on the matter.
It makes decent debate hard work though … like trying to grab a snake by it’s tail.
yes it’s pointless
In 1939, if there had been a vote on it in the US, the voters would have been happy to let Hitler take the whole of Europe. Lindenberg and his pro-Germany stance was very popular. Getting involved in another war was not. So it is not true to say many people thought Hitler taking Europe was going to be a stepping stone to then taking the US. More like the thinking on both sides of the Atlantic was about regions of influence - the US have oversight over the Americas.
Really, with Hitler attacking from the East and the might of Japan from the West, the voters would soon have been concerned regarding their layed back invincability.
If we’re harking back to WW2 America only came in at the end.
The US did not get involved in WW II until the Japanese attacked Pearl Harbor. The United States declared war on Japan. Than Germany declared war on the United states.
Unlike, France and Germany declared war on Germany.
Yes, there were American companies in Germany and across Europe. Those companies were taken over by Germany. Ford had companies in Germany and France and other countries but only after Germany taking them over were the converted to making military trucks and other transport vehicles.
No fixation, you asked me why we cannot trust Spain and I gave you the answer, which you still seem unable to take in.
the voters would have been happy to let Hitler take the whole of Europe
That is an opinion, the US was recovering great depression and did want to get involved in another European war. The goal than as it is now was to put America first.
Charles Limburger were originally a supporter of Germany as well as other American citizens. Just like European countries were supporters of Germany.