The Telegraph
Trump started a war Gulf states didn’t want. How he’s ending it has worried them more
Story by Adrian Blomfield • 5h
Once the dunkoff, always the dunkoff…
Mediate
‘It was chaos’: US troops who survived deadly Iranian attack dispute Pentagon’s version of events
Story by Jennifer Bowers Bahney • 7h
The chief component has always been man (species), and how he uses the concept. Religious extremist are normally indoctrinated and intolerant of those with differing belief concepts. As I have said, time and again, it is the human component and what they choose to do with it. What has been occurring more and more in recent decades (actually centuries )are clashes between religious ideology, and is exemplified by what is currently happening in the Middle East, Israel (Zionism) / Iran (Islam) / The USA (extremist Christian White Nationalists), and the irony of it all, Christianity and Islam are both direct offsprings of Zionism. We can do this over and over Ms. AnnieS, but the main issue is now, always will be, the greed of man (species), he does not conform to ideology, he conforms ideology to him.
This seems to be more an issue of group identity than anything else. It’s human nature to form distinct groups and to compete against other groups. That is why we have been warring with each other since our time here began. You can blame it on formal frameworks of beliefs, but I see it more as the fable of the scorpion and frog. The psychological community is forever divided about nature vs nurture.
Human nature won’t change whether religion exists or not. People will just find another thing to worship/believe and those who are manipulative and seek control will find another channel to use.
So clueless that he is worth 6.5 Billion Dollars, regardless of source.
Fairly obvious from recent postings.
At least you own what you say, good job Davey boy, or should I say Nazi Don bootlicker!
Probably the biggest crime syndicate in the US, Nazi Trump Syndicate., this Nazi has ripped off the American people, continuously.
Many users share the sentiment that MSN has declined in quality, frequently describing it as a “trashy tabloid” or “clickbait” in online discussions. In 2020, Microsoft shifted to an algorithmically driven, personalised feed, replacing a team of human editors Users often report sensationalist, inaccurate, or low-quality content, including misinformation. The feed is often perceived as cluttered and irrelevant . The comment sections on MSN articles are often criticised as being toxic, racist, or filled with misinformation.
Explains why a majority voted for him twice then.
This conversation could continue in circles indefinitely, but the problem is / always has been, humans and their greed. Human invented ideology (religion/ politics) has always been but a means to exploit the masses. Does it mean all people are evil , no, but the potential to be is always there, and in the name of one’s self interest, usually wins out. We’ve continuously gone over this since yesterday, you have your opinion/ I have mine, there appears (between you and I) no happy medium, goodday on this subject Ms. AnnieS, it’s been a pleasure.
The same can be said of any US news media because of pressure / attempt to suppress/ censor by the current Nazi Regime, even Fox News (the mouth piece of American Nazism) has had it’s problems, but because YOU do not like what they write does not make them inaccurate / wrong, as a matter of fact, the article you fell to pieces over had been accurate and repeated by many news agencies around the world. So I would suggest you stick to reading the “Nazi Gazette”, it will give you the “fake news” / lies/ propaganda you’re looking for.
Actually, the majority of voters who voted, voted for Nazi Don by a slim margin (1.6%), but more eligible voters did not vote because we were getting nothing but extremist candidates from both Republicans / Democrats. 77.3 million Nazis voted for Nazi Don, 89.1 million eligible voters did not bother to vote, that is the recipe for American Nazism.
1 Like
Putting aside your latest drivel, the question is why you continue to put endless posts on directing members to MSN, when it is a known fact that the contents have no basis in fact, even when they contain articles which members will have expertise in. Well the reason is obvious, you are so desperate and fanatical to get your opinions over, that you are prepared to post any trash available that supports your views…
Yesterday I totally refurbished the multi/fuel woodburner and all the surroundings, quite a big and heavy job for a disabled old guy, but it is good to do something useful in life. Today start to attack the Victorian Conservatory.
As per norm, you’re wrong, most my posts are not even US news sources, but you keep on trying Davey boy.
By which of course I mean that it is good to do something useful in life. Added as not allowed, it seems to amend my posts.
Enough to get an MSN T-Shirt.
Your uninformed comments do not bother me, you have very little of substance to say to anyone, you appear as 1 very miserable person.
1 Like
It does seem worth your while providing some justification for this claim. One looks at Fox News in the US and GB News in the UK and most often sees tremendous bias and unfounded claims. But I doubt that MSN reaches those levels of made up pish. So provide some details or retract your daft claim.
2 Likes
No need. I read what it produces, in areas that I have actual knowledge and expertise and notice that which I have mentioned . Also you can Google the views from other sources regarding its fit for purpose. Anybody who depends on that site for information should be reading the Beano or Dandy.