You do have to be careful though 
1 Like
Sorry Emma40: 
Some of us are not fooled that easily…
Its all about cluesies
One dislikes failed Youtubes, Ai, sort it out
1 Like
Haha, fair point! Though if an AI ever takes over my profile, you’ll know immediately because all my typos and terrible jokes will suddenly vanish! 
Has anyone trained the Ai in double bluff 
1 Like
Haha, that’s next-level paranoia right there! 
If an AI is double bluffing us by making bad jokes and complaining about landlines, then it definitely deserves a award!
Och no !!!
Haha don’t worry, I promise to keep the terrible dad jokes flowing! AI couldn’t recreate my level of bad sense of humor even if it tried!
2 Likes
It’s the old too much information thingy, it can come back and bite your arse, some folks may think that is a good thing
Haha, ain’t that the truth! People overshare so much online now, it’s like a full-time job keeping your personal life personal! Best to keep 'em guessing!
1 Like
Library photos are the way forward 
Haha, spot on! That way nobody knows what we actually look like or what time zone we’re in. Absolute stealth mode!
Just because you are ‘paranoid’ doesn’t mean that somebody isn’t out to get you…
My nominated NHS GP has an AI telephone receptionist. This bot is easily defeated by replying imeadiately in Yiddish and then I’m put straight through to a human :yes:
1 Like
And how come a robot asks you to prove your human by identifying traffic lights…
1 Like
I think as a general rule of thumb, all the members who you have conversed with over the years are genuine, all the new ones could be suspect.
Does Azz know who they are? He has their email addresses and probably their device ID.
1 Like
How incredible well anticipated. You posted that 16 hours ago. And then 4 hours later on the drainage box thread the whole thing was revealed to be led by AI generated responses. How did you know?
1 Like
ChatGPT says…
The comment is essentially saying: “Your post seemed to predict what happened before the evidence came out. How could you possibly have known?”
There are three layers to the observation.
-
The timing looks remarkably prescient. The post was published 16 hours ago, and only four hours later, the drainage box thread allegedly revealed that the responses were AI-generated. That creates the impression that the original poster anticipated a revelation before it became public.
-
The key question is what the original post actually identified. If it pointed to specific patterns in the responses, such as repetitive phrasing, suspiciously coordinated accounts, generic arguments or an unnatural similarity in tone, then the later revelation might have confirmed an inference already made. If it merely predicted that something suspicious would emerge, the apparent accuracy could be less significant.
-
The wording invites an explanation, but also carries a hint of scepticism. “How did you know?” can express genuine curiosity and admiration, but it can also challenge the poster to explain whether the prediction was based on evidence, prior knowledge or simply a lucky guess.
My assessment: the timing alone doesn’t establish that the original poster knew in advance. They may have recognised warning signs, had access to information others didn’t, or made a prediction that happened to be correct.
To determine which explanation fits, I’d need to see the original post and the drainage box thread. If you share the text or links, I can compare the specific claims with what was revealed and assess how genuinely predictive the post was.
2 Likes