Who cares, really?
Itās not a good idea to post here or anywhere.
A āStatementā. Tantamount to Libel.
With AI. & Universal Analytics.
It can come back and Bite Hard.
There is an interesting programme all about Farage on ItV tonight after the late news.
Those in doubt should watch it.
In doubt, about what?
I have no doubt that all politicians are self-serving parasites, the longer theyāre in the job, the worse they get.
āallegedā is a useful word.
Unfortunately, Burnham didnāt use it when he referred to the āallegedā murderer of Ann Widdecombe, but for some reason he gets a free pass, whereas the rest of us would get a prison sentence.
That was at PMQās, so donāt tell me nobody heard it, itās out there.
So is the āallegedā murderer going to get a fair trial?
Are you claiming that people are pretending Burnham did not make a mistake at PMQ or are you sharing a news article in which its clear Burnham acknowledges his error?
More than useful. A perfectly correct adverb.

Burnam wasnāt a witness. He was respectively using the term used by advisers investigating at a very early stage.
And Nit Pickers.
Like all the maggots in the Woodpile. Rant on, as if he was the perpetrator. Small wonder 5 PM,s in as many months. Jumped overbord. Like
No Stamina Rat-Bagās.
Doubt about the type of person in the Reform Party, including officials, racist, misogynist and worse. This year long investigation reveals shocking and disturbing evidence.
Maybe ādisturbingā to you Helen, but common sense to most.
How can it be āRacismā who knows what race, or mix of races enter these shores illegally, and it appears no one cares.
Strange how we have to support them when they supposedly paid thousands for their passage.
Where on earth did they get that kind of money from, were they all wealthy business people?
If so. why didnāt they take the legal route?
It couldnāt be that some rich and powerful people are actually financing them could it?
What legal route?
I would never vote for Farage , it just seems one dodgy revelation after another with him and the Reform Party
The legal route would be to obtain a visa and work permit and buy a plane ticket if they had so much money. It would have been cheaper and saferā¦But you already knew that didnāt you Lincsā¦
Itās all put up to discredit Farage and the Reform party Ripple, truth is, they are frightened that Reform have so much support and could unseat the usual miscreants.
Itās good seeing dodgy, you know where you are ![]()
True, it is just good old xenophobia, there is a lot of it about, egged on by Farage and other extremist groups with no policies or solutions.
But all put up by Reform people themselves or their supporters. Explain that approach to discreditting Reform, please.
Edit: it took me a few minutes to work it out. Here is the rationale. It starts with Reform being staunchly against the (as yet not defined) establishment. Then it moves to Reform gaining more significant support. Then Reform rails against establishment political parties, maybe they are the establishment? Then a whole pile of Tories jump over to Reform. Then Reform happens to glance in the mirror and notices that they have become established⦠and quite a bit of them are from the establishment. So Reform determines that they need act against themselves. Makes sense now.
Is it xenophobia wanting to prevent undocumented and illegal entry into your country Bruce?
I would vote for Farage and the reform party even if that was their only policy. It is the elephant in the room that nobody else wants to address.
Not if they are seeking asylum. It is not possible to seek asylum from outside the UK. You cannot obtain a visa for travel if you are intending to seek asylum. The UK govt does not permit any visa travel for refugees (except from Ukraine and Afghans who worked for UK military).
If you are aiming to get a visa to travel to the UK for work then that work must be agreed and evidenced as an employment contract - or student place. Otherwise you will not be given a visa (except for holiday or business travel with return journey evidenced).
So explain again, please, this legal route you refer to.
The placard people are purporting a principle, not representing folks in the real world.