Farage/Reform caught "breaking the law on party funding"

The little rat and the rest of the deform lot need to be in prison!

Channel 4 News and VerbatimInvestigations, a group of investigative journalists, reveal a plot to break the law on party funding at the highest levels of Reform UK.

Earlier this year James Orr, the party’s Head of Policy, and Dan Jukes, a close aide to Nigel Farage, arranged for a US company to secretly fund three influential polls that were commissioned by the party.

Mr Orr and Mr Jukes did not know that the supposed donors behind the US company were actually an undercover team from Verbatim posing as a wealthy American and his UK-based son, “William Lockwood”.

The US company that made the poll payments and the supposed American financier, resident in the US, are not permissible donors under electoral law. Donations of this size must be declared to the Electoral Commission.

Mr Jukes also proposed a scheme to get a larger sum of money into the party by having the American father donate via his UK-resident son. This would be illegal.

The undercover work was conducted by Verbatim, an investigative group independent of Channel 4 News that was founded by journalists from the Centre for Climate Reporting.

After being approached by Verbatim with the findings, journalists at Channel 4 News have since thoroughly checked and verified them. Channel 4 News did not pay for the polling and paid no money to Verbatim or any associated company.

Channel 4 News approached Reform UK, Mr Farage, Mr Jukes and Mr Orr for comment on the findings of this investigation. They did not comment but we understand they deny the allegations in full.

JL Partners, which conducted the polls, said it holds itself to high standards. A spokesman said: “Despite there being no concern about the accuracy of our work, the report did reveal weaknesses in our procedures. For that reason JL Partners is reviewing those procedures in order to eliminate possible grey areas and ambiguities and strengthen our safeguards for the future.”

A spokesperson from Telegraph Media Group said: “We are reviewing our future relationship with this polling company, as we believe we have been misled. As a matter of precaution we have suspended the relevant articles while The British Polling Council conducts a review.”

The Times said it “was not made aware of Reform’s involvement in commissioning and arranging payment of the poll”.

The British Polling Council said its members must declare publicly who has commissioned their polls. A spokeswoman said: “From the information provided to us by Channel 4 News, it appears there may have been deliberate breaches of this rule."

2 Likes

And yet, you’ll get people who’ll say it’s fake news, and still think he’ll be pm, god help us if that becomes true…

1 Like

God help us even more if it doesn’t happen.

Policy not person, surely.

1 Like

And that is from a traditional “Lefty” :icon_wink:

Polar Shift :grin:

To an extent. If it were the fella formerly called “Prince” Andrew in cahoots with the “Duchess of Sussex” Meghan advocating those policies, I suspect that things might not be going quite so rosey. :wink:

Another very rich person promising to help make the lives of poorer people better.
Yeah sure!

1 Like

You may well be right. But, given that voting for the same old, same old, seems somewhat akin to the saying that “The definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results”, there is a case for trying something that at least has a semblance of a new approach.

Reform may prove to not be the answer after all, but then again the standard alternatives do seem to be part of the (complacent) problem. Worth a punt?