What are ‘climate change’ activists going to do about the Russian volcano eruption?
Net Zero, my arse!
2 Likes
Net Zero = no gasoline, no natural gas, no coal etc etc 
3 Likes
Still believe the Met office when they tell you it was ‘the hottest’ ‘wettest’ ‘dryist’ etc…
3 Likes
Off Course its a Hoax.
Raining Is COPS way of keeping Gas Bills down.
Known as “Natural Showring”.
1 Like
2 Likes
Errrrrrrr Excuse me, Mr. Miliband.
Was it Carbon Emission That caused.
“The Ice Age”.
Or. A Prehistoric Artificial Intelligence Hoax 
3 Likes
People these days think the world was only created in 1800 QeS that’s when most records of mostly anything began.
3 Likes
Yes Foxy. The wisdom of the “Z.Generation.”
The “A. Generation”. Printed Almanacs 1475.
The “C.Generation” A trifle earlier. Con-Fu-Ci-Us.
The “AI. Generation”. Still not sure. If it’s.
Punched, Bored, or CounterSunk.
Personally. I’m getting off the World. At the next Bus Stop
.
1 Like
if all this green energy is going to be used to power AI then that is the real hoax of the century
4 Likes
AND, If this bloody UK Government has it’s way they will put them all up here in The Highlands. Seems to most of us who live here that Starmer won’t be happy untill Scotland is one big wind farm 
4 Likes
Funny you should mention that Rox…
And this is what’s underneath every wind turbine constructed. It will be filled with concrete that will never be able to be removed even after the turbine has long gone.
How is this helping the planet?
1 Like
4 Likes
Here’s the problems transporting the damn things on our wee narrow roads. Total nightmare for everyone, locals and the lorry drivers. Been held up a few times by these.
2 Likes
They haven’t thought this through have they Rox.
A lot of the remote turbines aren’t even connected to the grid yet.
Can you imagine how much heavy duty copper cable is going to be needed?
A power station can be built close to a distribution junction on the grid.
Just madness… 
So called ‘Sustainable’ electricity is going to be the most expensive in the world, and the most unreliable.
2 Likes
Rather like wind turbines.
I find them hypnotic and I’ve come across 100s of them on my travels around the U.K.
IMO they look good & seem to fit in nicely wherever situated.
I must emphasise this is my opinion, I don’t expect to be agreed with.
1 Like
I have 3 of them on my property. Of course I get paid for them being their. They don’t bother me because I don’t live there and the are in the middle of corn fields. Not that I’m losing sleep over them but when the contract end and I have to dispose of them, comes the problem. In which I’ll deal with when the time comes.
1 Like
We have over 7,000 wind turbines installed all over the country, mainly in the South. They really spoil the landscape, ghastly things, someone’s making so much money! 
2 Likes
Exactly how we feel.
2 Likes
From an engineering point of view I quite like them, and I agree with Ripple, I find them quite hypnotic especially the sound they make…However…
It’s the reason they are there that I don’t understand.
They are not cost effective, hence the price of electricity bills now.
It is not sustainable power. Each turbine requires an amazing number of parts, and you need to build 333 to produce the same output as a conventional power station burning coal or gas, and it’s reliant on the wind. Too much wind and they have to be limited or even shut down, and the wind might not blow at times of greatest demand. Wind turbines produce electricity whenever the wind blows, even when there is no demand, so it goes to earth but still has to be paid for. There is actually a shortage of copper, each wind turbine has to be connected to the grid, and the remote turbines will need massive amounts of heavy duty copper wire.
They also need an awful lot of oil…That needs changing on a regular basis…
Do you still think they are sustainable or even cost effective…
We are being conned…
1 Like