The Great Climate Hoax

What else can you expect from them? ā€œVery badā€ as he himself likes to say.

Hardly a ringing endorsement, perhaps it’s ā€œ fake newsā€ā€¦

I can see by the limited number of replies that either people have fell for the great deception of ā€˜Net Zero’ hook line and sinker, or they are just not bothered and prefer to go along with the illusion. Do you prefer to listen to the nonsense spat out by politicians who are being controlled by the big money people, who actually run this planet, and forget everything you were taught in schools about photosynthesis?
Here’s a reminder from AI…
Plants absorb carbon dioxide (CO2) from the atmosphere through photosynthesis, a process where sunlight, water, and CO2 are converted into glucose (sugar) for food, and oxygen is released. This absorption helps regulate CO2 levels in the atmosphere and stores the carbon in the plant’s tissues, roots, and soil, acting as a [carbon sink]

We are being taken for fools with made up or corrupt statistics that we (the common people) have no way of proving wrong, and this is pivotal to selling you this false theory.
They do it to provoke a response…The people don’t like to think they are being made to do something, so they arrange the information so that we ask for them to do it…
50 years ago the thought of building a nuclear power station would have caused riots…now, we beg them to build them…Why? Because they have brainwashed you into thinking that burning fossil fuel is bad and you are destroying the planet for the future and our young people…
Who would have purchased an electric vehicle 50 years ago…They were actually in production then…and give up your reliable ICE vehicle?
Farmers are paid Ā£40,000 per annum to have a wind turbine on their land…

Conclusion and key points for land owners:

The boom in onshore wind power, likened to a ā€œnew industrial revolutionā€, is being dominated by a small number of private landowners who will share around Ā£1bn in rental fees over the next eight years.

Rental payments vary and are secret but, say property agents speaking in confidence to the Guardian, landowners can now expect circa Ā£40,000 a year ā€œrisk-freeā€ for each large turbine erected on their land. Those set to benefit include senior members of the royal family and the Forestry Commission in Wales and Scotland.

Of course they want you to use expensive green energy…Somebody is making a lot of cash from the deception.
Wake up people!.. :009:

2 Likes

I’ve not fallen for it Foxy I have just learnt to keep my mouth shut on the subject along with a couple of other subjects :zipper_mouth_face:
My beliefs get me into arguments and I don’t need the stress just now. :wink:

4 Likes

Unfortunately, it’s a known fact that we (intending the whole planet!) are being controlled and manipulated by financial institutions.

1 Like

Its all very well (pun intended) Drill Baby drill, what happens when the well runs dry, you need an alternative fuel source, the structure for which is happening around us, this would probably be happening regardless of any profiteering off the back of it by the super rich.

1 Like

I suppose it could also be said that people have fallen for the great deception that man made climate change isn’t true, those global elites want you to keep using fossil fuels…

2 Likes

That’s the point, Climate Change or not, we still need to find a renewable alternative

4 Likes

Thanks for the reminder, Bob. It’s true that we were taught how photosynthesis basically works. What we need to do now is check what happens if the general conditions for this process change, e.g., will a higher CO² concentration caused by fossil fuels accelerate photosynthesis so that more CO² is absorbed thus reducing the CO² concentration and its harmful effects on global warming increasingly and permanently? The answer is no.

1 Like

That’s probably the way to go Rox, it’s not like some old geezers on a forum are going to make a difference. What will happen, will happen…I should probably stay away from ā€˜X’
:frowning_face:

You’ve hit the nail on the head there Rose…We are just like pawns on a chess board.

1 Like

Actually Spitty I don’t think the wells will run dry, not in our kids, grand kids or their grand kids lifetime…We are more likely to be overcome by some other event than running out of oil, coal or natural gas. Or the climate turning the planet into a raging inferno because we raised the amount of CO2 from 0.038% to 0.04% and even then you would have to get China, Russia and even Australia Onside…
Quote…
Coal

I don’t suppose they mine all that coal to just look pretty…I expect somebody will burn it…
And interestingly (It should be in the ā€˜Interesting Facts’ bit)
A oil company in America closed down a well because it started increasingly to produce less and less oil. However, when the price of oil went up, they decided to skim off whatever oil was left in the that well…They were surprised to find that it started producing oil higher than it had ever produced before, which led them to believe that the well had actually filled up with oil…But from where? It has been suggested that the earths mantle is actually surrounded by oil and it leeches through into the higher rocks, and not all oil actually derives from fossils as first thought…
Of course they don’t want you to know this… :009:

1 Like

Did a thread on ā€œThe Voidā€ probably ten years ago Foxy, I would have gone back there and Dug it Up (pun intended) but I looked for the old site recently and it seems to have disappeared.
I’ll have a nosey

I would expect that if the uptake of more CO2 would accelerate photosynthesis (which I don’t believe it would due to deforestation etc) then it would also produce more oxygen during daylight hours, and photosynthesis produces more than just CO2 and Oxygen so the balance would remain the same.

Photosynthesis

I have 3 wind turbines on my and my brothers property. Here are a few things that the average person does not know. Specifically on mine, we have a contract for 25 years that pay $36,000 a year. That’s the good part. The down side is, they can extend the contract if everyone agrees, not mandatory. They do not have to disassemble or take them down at the end of contracts. We will be responsible for removing them.

2 Likes

Thanks Robin, appreciate the info…
:+1:
I don’t blame landowners for for accepting wind turbines on their land, I’d probably do it myself. In this world, you and your family are your first priority…

1 Like

Lets not confuse Science with meteorology and climatology, Science is exact and open to challenge, whereas Meteorology and Climatology are as they suggest ā€˜forecasts’ using mostly guess work and computer modelling (and usually wrong) and not open to challenge. :009:

1 Like

What are ā€˜climate change’ activists going to do about the Russian volcano eruption?

Net Zero, my arse!

2 Likes

Net Zero = no gasoline, no natural gas, no coal etc etc :grin:

3 Likes