It is well known on here my love of photography, ever since my Brownie 127 camera as a child taking photos and seeing them years later is a great reminder.
Progressed through 35mm film cameras to Nikon DLSR cameras via a Kodak 7200 2mp camera. .
On the way started to get interest in “movie” camcorders the first being a Sanyo 8mm tape one. Now progressed onto digital video work.
Started off with a Panasonic HC-X900m consumer camcorder which I had for about 10 years until wear and tear made it not worth repairing. Then via a disappointing Sony ax53 after reading all the hype, so onto to this Panasonic HC-X1500 pro camcorder.
So back to the heading
which do I prefer? Obviously this latest one but may not be suitable for the casual videographer. With this panasonic the thing that stands out is having the choice of neutral density filters built in to name but one and also shows in the viewer screen the correct one from clear to 1/64. So nice to be able to choose the settings and not like that Sony one having the camcorder do it all for you.
There is so much to consider if buying a camcorder such as price - size -menu -sound reproduction, and of course weight let alone having two SD card slots, possibly more to think of than a camera.
so what is the advantage of a camcorder over a stills camera?
to me it is being able to photograph the area where shooting from- movement and sound.A cameracan only show what it is pointed at although admittedly some of the DSLR videos are good admittedly.
JUST MY PERSONAL OPINION