New WHO Covid Report Proves Sweden Was Right

Bread · 25 May 2022 11:50

Essentially, Sweden followed the actual science and not The Science™, with the requisite trademark and capital letters. That would include the guides that were prepared prior to the panic, inaccurate modeling, political motivations and crisis obsession took over.

gumbud · 25 May 2022 12:37

so 98% of the scientists around the world got it wrong then??

Bread · 25 May 2022 12:44

Looks like it.

The phrase… “who is the bigger fool, the fool in front or the fool that follows” springs to mind

Cinderella · 25 May 2022 12:51

@Bread Do not believe many will be surprised in slightest.
WHO only acknowledge the facts grudgingly.

Bread · 25 May 2022 12:56

Yep, they lied and lied over the pandemic to protect the CCP.

Cinderella · 25 May 2022 13:03

Absolutely!

gumbud · 26 May 2022 08:07

so WHO can we believe if we can’t believe the WHO? A friend of mine once asked me where are all these stats comin from anyway? I said WHO he asked WHO I said ???

Cinderella · 26 May 2022 11:02

WHO are you!

Bread · 27 May 2022 07:28

And would you believe it ?

butterscotch · 27 May 2022 12:51

That study also found that mask wearing was the most effective intervention. I believe this could be true.

This new report is actually an upward revision of their earlier lower estimate of the fatality rate from .2% to 3% for lockdowns. Maybe it will go up further over time.

Bread · 27 May 2022 12:56

The mask wearing wouldn’t have made any difference either, like we saw in Germany when covid rates went up when mandatory masking was introduced.

There are big gaps all around masks because they are sealed to your face. Covid virus particles are about 3000 times smaller than the holes in them. People touching masks putting them on and off probably did more to spread covid infections than if people were not wearing them at all. Masks were just theatre nothing more.

butterscotch · 27 May 2022 12:57

I’m quoting your report.

Bread · 27 May 2022 12:58

Yes - I didn’t say I agreed with all of it.

butterscotch · 27 May 2022 13:04

If that’s all it takes to invalidate some or all of a study or report is just to decide not to agree with it without any other validating evidence, there’s no reason to bring validating evidence to begin with.

Bread · 27 May 2022 13:41

Eh ?

What do you mean ?

It validates what I said about Sweden and lockdowns were pointless.

Bread · 28 May 2022 19:45

Oh look…

Bread · 8 June 2022 17:44

I just can’t think what could gave caused this …

Mups · 8 June 2022 19:00

I can’t access that link, Bread? It only lets me see the headline, then it says if I want to continue reading I’ve got to log in or join up to something or other.
I’m not prepared to do that.

butterscotch · 8 June 2022 19:14

I had no problem accessing that page. Here are a few quotes.

The AstraZeneca vaccine may increase the risk of the serious neurological condition Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) with the jab’s Trojan horse delivery system possibly to blame, scientists believe, in a discovery which may apply to similar vaccines.

GBS is a rare condition which causes muscle numbness and pain, and can hinder movement, walking, swallowing and, sometimes, even breathing.

It is commonly caused by the gastroenteritis bug Campylobacter, which has a surface coating which looks slightly human, and so can sometimes trigger the body to attack its own nerves instead of invading germs, leading to GBS.

Now, scientists at University College London (UCL) have found a rise in cases of GBS in the first two to four weeks after the AstraZeneca vaccine, but not in other vaccines, such as Pfizer or Moderna.
. . . .
GBS affects about 1,500 people in the UK each year and 30 to 40 per cent of cases have no known causes, leading researchers to suspect that adenovirus could be a factor.

During the 1976 swine flu vaccination campaign in the USA, there was a small increase in GBS associated with the flu jab at that time, leading scientists to question whether the Covid jabs could have a similar effect.

To find out, UCL researchers carried out a population-based study of NHS data in England to track GBS case rates against vaccination rollout.

Between January to October 2021, 996 GBS cases were recorded in the UK National Immunoglobulin Database, but there was an unusual spike in GBS reports occurring between March and April 2021.

For these two months there were about 140 cases per month compared to historical rates of about 100 per month - a 40 per cent increase.

Analysis showed 198 GBS cases (20 per cent) occurred within six weeks of the first-dose Covid-19 vaccination in England.

Overall, following a first dose of the AstraZeneca vaccine there were 5.8 excess GBS cases per million doses of vaccine, equating to an absolute total excess between January-July 2021 of between 98-140 cases.

The rate is still significantly lower than the one in 1,000 rate of GBS associated with Campylobacter.
. . . .
Recent data from the US also suggests that the Johnson & Johnson Janssen vaccine - which also uses an adenovirus entry system - raises the risk of GBS to similar levels as the AstraZeneca jab.

“We know that Pfizer and Moderna don’t cause BDS but Johnson & Johnson and AstraZeneca do and the only commonality link is an adenovirus vector,” added Prof Lunn.

“Johnson & Johnson is not the same one because they use a human adenovirus but it’s similar and the implications are broad because adenoviruses are used in quite a lot of vaccines and genetic therapies.

“The benefits from these vaccines and drugs are huge and the risk is tiny and there aren’t that many viral vectors you can use, but it’s good that the public are aware of the risks.

Mups · 8 June 2022 19:16

Butterscotch, did you have to log in to something first?

Thanks for that, anyway.