Matt Hancock disputes claim he rejected care home Covid advice

Continuing the discussion from Covid: Government policy of discharging hospital patients to care homes 'unlawful':

WhatsApp messages leaked to the Daily Telegraph newspaper suggest Mr Hancock was told in April 2020 there should be “testing of all going into care homes”.

Government guidance later mandated tests only for those leaving hospital.

A spokesman for Mr Hancock said the messages had been “doctored”. “These stolen messages have been doctored to create a false story that Matt rejected clinical advice on care home testing. This is flat wrong,” he said in a statement.

The Telegraph has obtained more than 100,000 messages sent between Mr Hancock and other ministers and officials at the height of the pandemic. The texts were passed to the newspaper by journalist Isabel Oakeshott, who has been critical of lockdowns. Ms Oakeshott was given copies of the texts while helping Mr Hancock write his book, Pandemic Diaries.

In one message, dated 14 April, Mr Hancock reportedly told aides that Prof Sir Chris Whitty, the chief medial officer for England, had conducted an “evidence review” and recommended “testing of all going into care homes, and segregation whilst awaiting result”. The message came a day before the publication of Covid-19: Our Action Plan for Adult Social Care, a government document setting out plans to keep the care system functioning during the pandemic.

Mr Hancock said the advice represented a “good positive step” and that “we must put into the doc”, to which an aide responded that he had sent the request “to action”.

But later the same day, Mr Hancock messaged again saying he would rather “leave out” a commitment to test everyone entering care homes from the community and “just commit to test & isolate ALL going into care from hospital”. “I do not think the community commitment adds anything and it muddies the waters,” he said.

A spokesman for Mr Hancock said this followed an operational meeting, where he was advised it was not possible to test everyone entering care homes.

When the care plan was published on 15 April, it said the government would “institute a policy of testing all residents prior to admission to care homes”, but that that would “begin with all those being discharged from hospital”.

It said only that it would “move to” a policy of testing everyone entering care homes from the community.

There’s lot more information in the article.

As a commentator points out, only 20,000 tests a day could be processed in April, so prioritising was an issue. In that case, why were so many patients ejected from hospital, tested or not, into care homes:

Moving patients from hospitals to care homes

On 19 March 2020, NHS guidance said that “unless required to be in hospital, patients must not remain in an NHS bed”. This policy was implemented to free up beds in advance of an expected surge in coronavirus patients.

On 2 April, the rules on discharging patients to care homes were clarified, saying “negative [coronavirus] tests are not required prior to transfers/admissions into the care home”.

Even elderly patients who tested positive could be admitted to care homes, if measures - such as wearing personal protective equipment (PPE) and isolation - were used.

From 15 April, the government said that all patients discharged from hospitals would be tested for coronavirus.

By this time, an estimated 25,000 patients had been discharged to care homes. In July, Panorama gathered data from 39 hospital trusts, which showed three-quarters of people discharged were untested.

Up to this point more than 5,700 care home residents had died in England and Wales (either in homes or in hospital).

The statistics above are far from complete and the numbers of unrecorded infected and dead will always be greater but unknown.

Told you I was right about this.

It was a big con and now we have the evidence thanks to the integrity if Isabel Oakshotte.

1 Like

Ms Oakeshott claimed that she released the messages as it would take “many years” before the inquiry into the Government’s handling of the pandemic concluded and that she feared it would be a “whitewash”.

On Wednesday night, she accused Mr Hancock of sending her a “menacing” message in the early hours of the morning, which he has strongly denied.

In a statement released on Thursday, Mr Hancock said: “I am hugely disappointed and sad at the massive betrayal and breach of trust by Isabel Oakeshott. I am also sorry for the impact on the very many people – political colleagues, civil servants and friends – who worked hard with me to get through the pandemic and save lives. There is absolutely no public interest case for this huge breach. All the materials for the book have already been made available to the inquiry, which is the right, and only, place for everything to be considered properly and the right lessons to be learned.”

The leaked messages, of which there are more than 100,000, have included exchanges between Mr Hancock and senior figures, including former prime minister Boris Johnson, the UK’s Chief Medical Officer, Professor Sir Chris Whitty, and former education secretary Sir Gavin Williamson. A number of civil servants and former aides have also been directly named in the exchanges released by The Telegraph.

Mr Hancock said: “I will not be commenting further on any other stories or false allegations that Isabel will make. I will respond to the substance in the appropriate place, at the inquiry, so that we can properly learn all the lessons based on a full and objective understanding of what happened in the pandemic, and why.”

Well, one lesson learned is that Government ministers should not give their local pub landlord a £40m contract to produce something “to aid the pandemic efforts” … :roll_eyes:

No betrayal its in the public interest and Oakshotte is absolutely within her rights to do so as a journalist.

All that testing was a complete lie as well and turns out I was right about facemasks as well.

I’m already on my 2nd bag of popcorn this morning.

1 Like

I won’t quote any of the article - Hancock’s texts, coming from a government minister, are unbelievably moronic … :roll_eyes:

Luckily (sort of), he was fighting a pandemic and not a war … :man_shrugging:

Only one man would score higher on the moron scale and that, of course, would be BJ … :expressionless:

More of Hancock’s cretinous responses:

Sat here eating a scotch egg reading this.

That is the latest revelation from more than 100,000 WhatsApp messages leaked to the Telegraph by journalist Isabel Oakeshott, who was given them by the former health secretary while they were collaborating on his memoir.

The messages show Mr Hancock and others discussed how to use the Kent variant of the virus to scare the public so they would obey the rules.

In December 2020, Mr Hancock and his team were concerned that London Mayor Sadiq Khan could follow Andy Burnham - the mayor of Greater Manchester who had clashed with the government over the imposition of tougher restrictions in his region.

Mr Hancock’s adviser said: “Rather than doing too much forward signalling, we can roll pitch with the new strain.”

“We frighten the pants of everyone with the new strain,” the then health secretary responded, before lamenting that complications with Brexit were “taking the top line” in the news agenda.

The adviser said: “Yep that’s what will get proper behaviour change.”

“When do we deploy the new variant?” Mr Hancock said.

The new variant was publicly identified on 14 December and five days later Boris Johnson announced that families would no longer be able to meet for Christmas.

On 6 January 2021, England entered a third lockdown.

The more that’s disclosed about Hancock the more it seems that he’s a ton of bricks short of a load - some examples of his “career anomalies”:

  • On 15 July 2014, Hancock was appointed to the position of Minister of State for Business and Enterprise. Interviewed on the BBC Radio 4 Today programme, he rejected the suggestion that fracking was highly unpopular but he was unable to name any village that backed it.

  • In his role as Minister of State for Energy, he was criticised for hiring a private jet with senior diplomatic officials to fly back from a climate conference in Aberdeen, where he signed a deal with the Mexican President to use British expertise in Mexico.

  • Hancock was later criticised for accepting money from a key backer of climate change denial organisation Global Warming Policy Foundation.

  • In October 2014, he apologised after retweeting a poem suggesting that the Labour Party was “full of queers”, describing his actions as a “total accident”.

  • In early 2018, Hancock was the first MP to launch his own mobile app, which was meant as a social network for him to communicate with his constituents and give people updates in relation to his cabinet role. The head of privacy rights group Big Brother Watch called the app a “fascinating comedy of errors”, after the app was found to collect its users’ photographs, friend details, check-ins, and contact information.

  • As Secretary of State for Health and Social Care in November 2018, Hancock was criticised after appearing to endorse a mobile phone health app marketed by the subscription health service company Babylon in the Evening Standard. Babylon allegedly sponsored the newspaper article.

  • In October 2019, Hancock was lobbied by former Prime Minister David Cameron and financier Lex Greensill to introduce a payment scheme. Hancock was implicated in the Greensill scandal as the payment scheme was later rolled out within the NHS.

  • In April 2020, Hancock was criticised when it emerged that the target he had set for 100,000 daily COVID-19 tests had been met only by changing the method of counting, to include up to 40,000 home test kits which had been sent, but not yet completed.

  • On 11 October 2020, Hancock denied breaching a 10 pm drinking curfew in the Smoking Room bar in the House of Commons, put in place because of the pandemic. Eight days later, the Daily Mirror published a photograph of him riding in his chauffeur-driven car without wearing a mask.

  • On 2 December 2020, Hancock incorrectly claimed that the MHRA’s fast approval of the first COVID-19 vaccine was possible because of Brexit. The MHRA stated that it had followed an expeditious procedure allowed under EU legislation which was still in force in the UK during the transition period.

  • In January 2021, shopping vouchers for families in need were reintroduced. On Good Morning Britain, Hancock praised the Government for reintroducing the scheme, despite being repeatedly reminded by Piers Morgan that he had opposed it in Parliament.

  • On 19 February 2021, after a legal challenge by the Good Law Project, a High Court judge ruled that Hancock had acted unlawfully by handing out PPE contracts without publishing details in a timely way.

  • In April 2021, it was reported that Hancock had been given 20% of shares in Topwood Limited, a firm based in Wrexham which is owned by his sister and other close family members. The company specialises in secure storage, scanning and shredding of documents. It won a place on a “procurement framework” listing to provide services to NHS England in 2019, as well as contracts with NHS Wales.

  • In April 2022, it was announced that Hancock would publish his diaries during the COVID-19 pandemic called Pandemic Diaries with Biteback Publishing, cowritten by Isabel Oakeshott. The book was not based on a diary but was written after the fact based on Hancock’s recollections as well his records of communications. Reviews comment that the book presented too positive an image, making Hancock seem unduly prescient with the benefit of hindsight, arguing there may be elements of revisionism.

Hancock’s lack of perception and awareness along with his self-absorption is remarkably immature … :roll_eyes:

It might not just be dyslexia that he’s suffering from … :thinking:

2 Likes

labour were Hancocks sympathisers. They would have gone much further and locked us down again and again.

You can point the finger at the Tories and blame them all you like, but Labour were supposed to be in opposition and hold them to account with the media, but they failed catastrophically.

If it were up to me I would throw the whole lot in jail, I just find it astonishing you’re picking sides and defending the cheerleaders of the lockdowns who are as culpable for the deaths and misery of millions just as much as the tories. Just think it was only a year or two ago you were doing the same - remember all those statistics you posted on deaths etc ?

1 Like