Harry’s charity and furlough

If this is true and it probably is else the Harkles will be suing in five minutes it’s a disgrace .

That’s an utter disgrace. That pair seem to be going out of their way to alienate themselves from the British people. They’re just sticking two fingers up at us.

well he’s not gettin any pay from the palace surely he is entitled to a small remit? covering costs I think they call it ? - after all he is married with two kids ??

1 Like

$38000? Pocket money!

Harvey Norman took $22million in Jobkeeper money and only repaid $6million of it after announcing record profits for the same period, they only repaid that because of the scandal that resulted after Scotty from Marketing said it was fine and they could keep it…

The Harry and his cute mate are just amateurs at swindling the taxpayer, they deserve every penny for providing the sense of moral outrage on this forum alone - $38000 seems a small price to pay.

1 Like

They have no need to alienate themselves from the British people Sheba…The media are doing it for them.

2 Likes

Who cares anyway ?
The less useless royal we have the better .

And what was your first clue?!? :grin: After the way they are being treated and received by Brits now, can you not understand why?

1 Like

It was Harry and Meghan who threw their family under a bus in interviews broadcast around the world. Can you not understand why, after that, they are being treated and received poorly by most Brits now?

3 Likes

This is good Bathsheba let the tacky pair stay in the States .
In fact with a bit of luck perhaps some more freeloaders might join them :slight_smile:

3 Likes

Absolutely! I sincerely hope they do. If the people over there can’t see through them, they can have them :wink:

They use the media as well so they can’t complain. The Oprah Winfrey interview for instance.

About time we scrapped having a “royal” family. There is nothing ROYAL about them . Charles having sex behind Diana’s back, his son now in the USA The queen unable now to fulfill royal duties due to old age . Harry as per heading “stealing” tax payers money for overseas charity.
Lets do away with them

3 Likes

Ah, and are you forgetting that interview was a year after Harry and Meg had discussed, weighed in the consequences of moving to another continent in hopes of having a happier life without the Frim? That was a life altering decision based on many cruelties by the British media, paparazzi, and indeed members of family Harry chose to leave behind. Diana’s life, and now Meg’s well being, not to mention Harry’s little ones, now may begin to bring smiles to their family. I certainly want only happiness for Harry’s family. It’s a shame others don’t feel the same.

1 Like

No I’m not forgetting all of that, and I understand entirely why they wanted to move away. Yes, Harry had had an awful lot to deal with, the trauma of losing his mother at such a young age, and the subsequent media circus tearing her to pieces. No one should have to live with that, it was appalling.

However, what I - and many others - object to is that he didn’t simply move away quietly and with dignity, to live in peace with his family away from the paparazzi and MSM. No, he and Meghan have courted the media ever since, and have grabbed every opportunity to talk about his terrible life, and the allegedly shocking way she was treated by the RF, and lay blame at the door of his family, knowing full well they would not publicly retaliate.

1 Like

What that man needs is a proper job , preferable a soulless boring low paid job for at least six months .
After that he would know what hardship really is and stop moaning about his fabulous lifestyle .
Of course while he’s doing that his race card playing wife would have divorced him and found another white multi millionaire to marry ,

1 Like

Megan was always going to have a supporting role to Kate. I don’t think it fitted her mindset.

You have to see the irony of it though …
An American, of all people, sticking up for a privileged born-with-a silver-spoon-in-his-mouth upper class Brit.
Bring back the Empire :rofl:

2 Likes

There were not many cruelties at all quite honestly that is all nonsense .I couldn’t care less if he’s happy or not he’s nothing to most people if a man with his advantages can’t be happy who can be . I don’t think for one minute that the Queen is bothered if she never sees his kids . She has plenty of great grandchildren and has always rather preferred dogs and horses to children anyway . . She may be 96 but she not ga ga .

1 Like

Oh yes, that is actually quite amusing, now I come to think of it :lol:

1 Like

That would be her loss. Royalty never liked anyone with a back bone…brits, either, come to that.:rofl: