Even that might not work, unless there is a final arbiter. Who would be chosen for that and how? The King, Courts [European], or voters. A raffle! the highest bidder!! tombola!!!
PR needs to be taken from the control of Westminster, if we are allowed a vote. We will not get one unless it is voted for. NONE. Even corruption would be unable to ‘fix’ a vote by all for change to a civil, clear, honest democracy. dēmos ‘people’ and kratos 'rule '. [sic]
It’s irrelevant to what was said but not to the prominence GB news gave it over other news.
Their right wing agenda is very clear and they’ll seize on anything they think might be damaging to Labour and treat it like it’s the most important news of the day over anything negative about the Tories
I always make note of the political bias of a media source I’m reading or watching
Because which stories they choose to report and give prominence to, over those they ignore or just give a passing comment on is as much propaganda as the slant they choose to put on those stories
The problem is probably that no one who is genuinely interested in balanced and fair would want to lower themselves to be their token Leftie because GBnews raison d’etre is to be right-wing biased
To appear on it is to give credibility to their false claim to being a real news channel
In our lifetime both Conservative and Labour governments have sold off the UK silverware to pay the mortgage.
In 1946, the UK government agreed to sell Rolls Royce Nene jet engines to the USSR as long as they don’t use it for military purposes. The Soviets quickly started putting them into jet fighter aircraft. [sic]
Will not vote for two parties that have destroyed Great Britain. Great country, crap politicians.