Conservatives: Who funds them, and what's in it for them?

JC Bamford Excavators Limited has given just over £2.5m in the last two years. Lord Bamford, the chairman of the family owned company, has personally given £100,000 since 2010, when the Conservatives returned to government. He became a Conservative peer in 2013.

Alasdair Locke is a veteran of the shipping and oil and gas industries, and a multimillionaire. “They will put you in everything you want,” he says, when I ask what he gets in return. Mr Locke has agreed to talk to me on the record, where others said they would speak to me, but only if I protect their identity.

Alasdair Locke

He has donated £280,000 to the Conservative Party since Boris Johnson became prime minister.

Electoral Commission rules mean any donation over £7,500 to a party has to be reported by that party, and the figure and the donor will be published.

“I can get access via the Leaders Group. It is usually senior ministers and 15 or 20 people. Sometimes in person. Sometimes on Zoom. The last thing I attended was a lunch with Michael Gove in July. It was all donors who were there.”

To become a member of the Leaders Group, you have to have donated £50,000 in the last year. Two to three lunches a week are arranged, to which around a dozen donors are invited. Groups don’t tend to be bigger than this, to ensure all those who turn up get a chance to feel part of something that isn’t impersonal. Some donors are very regular attendees, others don’t come to any.

Does this amount to buying access, and influence? “It is interesting, but I’m not sure we are that influential. Politicking doesn’t really interest or excite me. I would reckon I do get heard, but I don’t expect it to be acted upon,” Mr Locke says. Politicians are always cautious, in any case. At the lunch with Michael Gove, I asked about trade relations with the US. There was no attempt by any of us to influence policy."

It is not just the Leaders Group that donors can be a member of. There is the Treasurers Group, for those who have given £25,000, although I am told plenty of prospective members can be tempted to upgrade to the Leaders Group, as those with a spare 25 grand rattling around can often afford to double it.

There is then the Advisory Board, for those who have given £250,000 or more in the last year.

Transparency

But how transparent is this? The short answer: not very. Yes, there is the legal obligation for donors’ names and how much they have given to be published. But what they actually get for that money is much, much less clear, and less clear than it used to be.

Back in 2012, there was a big row about the then Conservative co-treasurer, Peter Cruddas. He resigned as party co-treasurer after The Sunday Times suggested he was offering access to then Prime Minister David Cameron for a donation of £250,000 a year. But the following year he won £180,000 in damages in a libel victory against the newspaper. The newspaper’s appeal succeeded in part and the damages were later reduced to £50,000.

Peter Cruddas is sixth in the league table of Conservative donors since Boris Johnson became prime minister, having given £1.1m. In December last year, Mr Johnson nominated him for a peerage, against the advice of The Lords Appointments Commission, describing the earlier allegations as “historic and untrue”.

After the row in 2012, David Cameron decided greater transparency was the answer, even if some internally felt donors were already being told they would be named by the Electoral Commission and a further step was unnecessary.

But Mr Cameron pressed ahead, and the Tories began to publish a public register of donors who attended private dinners with the then-PM.

But then, in 2018, they stopped. And there has been nothing since.

The moneyed and murky world of Conservative cronyism … :eyes:

And the Labour party are just as bad, just look at how many peerages Blair handed out, cronyism and then some.

4 Likes

How many … :question:

During his first term in office Blair created 203 life peerages whom the Conservatives referred to as “Tony’s Cronies” I think Johnson is up there when it comes to awarding peerages.

2 Likes

Blimey … that’s an awful lot … and I mean awful … :angry:

Are there any unions any more?Where does Labour get their money from now?

Why not start a thread about it … :question:

I’ll give it due consideration.

Why do we need another thread on what is substantially the same question?

2 Likes

There are many party members, like myself, that donate small amounts to their party and who do it in the belief that their chosen party philosophy will create a better country to live in, rather than would other political parties. The majority of those donations from party members including their membership subscriptions are very small and do nothing other than support the structure of the organisation.

It is a fact though, that many of the bigger donations, although some no doubt being purely altruistic, are seeking some sort of influence and this is true regardless of which party we are talking about. Donations from rich people and organisations donating to the Tories in the hope of perhaps securing a contract or influence are no different to rich people funding Labour and wanting some sort of influence, or the unions funding Labour then wanting to dictate party policy, all pots and kettles really and not just a single party problem by any means.

1 Like

I’ll hold my hand up to tossing a few coins into the Tory coffers …anything to keep that Corbyn away from completely copulating our group of nations.

My theory is that the basic reason that people enter any Committee, from Political right through to School Parent’s associations, is in order that they can influence that committee towards their own wishes.

Imagine the influence you might have if you were a Parent member of a Public School Committee?

(What’s in it for them?)

But, without that urge to be part of the control, what would we have?

If you don’t queue for petrol, you might need to walk.

If you don’t join the School governors, or various other control groups, in life, you’ll have no say!

Your experience of PTAs is obviously completely different to mine. When I chaired a PTA for around 8yrs, our main aim as to improve school situations for the pupils and teachers. Personal wishes had very little to do with anything unless the school as a whole benefited.

And now we have Johnson, talk about out of the frying pan into the fire.

I’d rather lightly sauté in a skillet than be burned furiously at the stake by the likes of Corbyn and his far far left band of wannbe’s. The politics of envy, which is what most of Corbynistas seem to be promoting, simply doesn’t wash with me.

I certainly did not want Corbyn running the country and the oh so weak Starmer would be a nightmare but the current government ha proved how far down British politics and politicians have fallen.
Can there be a more useless and corrupt government?
I supported Brexit but how poorly planned for has it turned out to be.
As for the pandemic can it have been any more poorly managed?

For me, the rot well and truly set into Westminster almost as soon as Blair took the chair with Mandelson always in his ear. Since then there has been a steep downward cruve that hopefully must be at rock bottom Yes, I too was a keen brexiteer and was probably one of those who forced that wimp Cameron to offer a referendum, as I deserted my usual choice for my X and placed it squarely with UKIP for a once only move. I agree with you about Starmer, or as my wife refers to him, Max Headroom. I was somewhat impressed by Emily Thornbury when she stood in for a PMQ’s some time back, but since then she has been lower in profile. As for the pandemic, I have given BJ the benefit of the doubt too many times and now I would like to see him replaced, but who could fill the vacancy and be any better? I really cannot answer my own question🤷‍♂️

1 Like

This is quite interesting, surprising too as I was under the impression many corporations donated to both major parties. But perhaps those come under a different type of donation, not the GE campaign specifically.

source

1 Like

More info:

The findings come ahead of the party’s annual conference, which starts on Sunday, where a host of oil and energy firms have paid for slots to advertise their businesses.

Greenpeace today accused Johnson of being “worryingly cosy with the fossil fuel sector”, despite the prime minister’s claim that “it’s right to be green”.

Companies vying for delegates’ attention at the Tory conference include oil giant BP, which has been accused of spending millions of pounds to lobby against climate change policies around the world.

Energy firms EDF (French) and E-ON (German) will also have a stand in the conference exhibition hall, along with petrochemical company INEOS (British).

Under Johnson’s leadership, the Conservative Party has received a series of huge donations from the energy sector, totalling more than a million pounds since the 2019 general election.

It includes £25,000 from Amjad Bseisu, the chief executive of North Sea oil firm EnQuest. And Alasdair Locke, who chairs a company that decommissions oil wells, has also given £180,000 to the party.

Donations have also come directly from businesses, including a £200,000 payment from Balmoral Group Holdings, a conglomerate that offers oil and gas technology and services.

Aquind, an underground electric cable company, has given £102,000 since the last election.

.Its boss, Ukrainian-born Alexander Temerko, has also given a further £12,000 in recent months, and has been a long-standing member of the elite ‘Leader’s Group’ of Tory donors. He and Boris Johnson are reportedly close, with Johnson encouraging him to call him ‘Alex’, the prime minister’s legal first name.

Something for nothing … :question:

Unlikely … :roll_eyes: