I was talking about “For low users”, in response to shropshiregirl’s post.
So perhaps you could explain how £30 per year is less than the £5 (or maybe even less) that Three’s 1-2-3 would cost if you only use the service rarely as shropshiregirl’s post would suggest? Read post two in this very thread for confirmation.
In the case to which I was responding the smart phone or old-style phone debate is irrelevant; it would appear that if shropshiregirl’s husband would continue using a mobile phone it would be a basic model for emergency use only.
I appreciate that your OP recommendation may be appropriate for some despite even the reported problems with this MVNO as shown earlier in this thread; not however in this case it would appear.
FYI and just as a polite pointer I note that 1p Mobile were reprimanded by the Advertising Standards/Ofcom:
The Advertising Standards Authority ruled that two adverts on 1p Mobile’s website and Facebook page broke the rules around fair advertising.
But it’s possible for consumers to buy £10 top-up deals from elsewhere that would work out cheaper than 1pMobile, Ofcom said.
http://simonlydeals.co.uk/1p-mobile-told-pull-uks-cheapest-claim/