A TL3 forum member of a specific designation may or may not wish to cause offence in changing your tags, because you chose them, and to change them or correct them would be going against your free will.
That seems very fair because as you say I did chose them admittedly arbitrarily and to change them without my expressed permission could lead to me suffering mental health issues relating to rejection.
But then youâd have to wait at least 5 years for a GP appointment, and then 10 years for any counselling - unless you could afford to pay of course.
I was thinking more like Jason Straitham.
Iâd change them if I knew how just to see some of that!
Suggestions anyone?
âSlap headâ âcue ballâ âbarrack room lawyerâ âcanât be arsed with tagsâ
Perhaps I should start a poll?
With all this criticism of the tag facility I can feel a âslow moâ coming on my thread.
what I donât get is when I hear of ridiculous news like this, everyone comes out saying how ridiculous it is and there is a public outcry about it, YET still the woke idiots win. Whatâs that about?
Maybe in the future evolution will see us being born without mouths, eyes and ears then no one can be offended. Stupid statement I know but what the heck, thatâs what it feels like.
Iâm fed up of being made to feel like a bad person because I have my own views that differ from the woke culture.
I was thinking more like Jason Straitham.
Who? ?
Jason Straitham.
Actor in action films like the Transporter films.
I agree, QueenieâŠI think we should all be offended at the fact we are causing offence by the people who find these words offensive.
Blimey if that statement doesnât say "Iâve had too much coffee already" I donât know what will!
Actor in action films like the Transporter films.
Thank you, Mr Fraggle, but Iâll stick with Yul!
Blimey if that statement doesnât say "Iâve had too much coffee already" I donât know what will
I was thinking something somewhat stronger.
Câmon, say what you mean so I can take offence at your accusations!
I think the crux of this case was that the term âbaldâ was not being used merely as a descriptive word but as an insulting phrase, teamed with the âcâ word and delivered by his boss in an intimidating manner - thatâs a very different kettle of fish to just describing someone as bald.
Without knowing all the ins and outs of the case, itâs hard to say for sure but it sounds like there was wrongs on both sides - his employers say he wasnât doing the job satisfactorily but they didnât deal with disciplining him correctly and lost their temper and insulted him - then they jumped the gun by dismissing him before their complaint to the police about him mis-using police headed paper was dealt with - he used both these errors as an opportunity to claim unfair dismissal and claim compensation.
The employer should have considered the possible repercussions before they acted so hastily.
When I worked in HR, I remember how easy it was for shirkers and unsatisfactory workers to claim unfair dismissal if the employer didnât follow the proper procedure before sacking someone.
Many a time, it was galling to see a blatant shirker drawing a salary while you went through all the stages needed to get rid of them but if you lose your temper or try to short-cut the process, youâre handing them a way of making more even money out of the Company by claiming unfair dismissal.
Are you bald by any chance?
Thanks Mr Fraggle for putting up photo.
No @MrFraggle67 , I am not bald - but I donât see why that is relevant to the employment tribunal we were commenting on.
If I was bald, I would try to come to terms with it but I wouldnât consider it a laughing matter - and I may not take offence if some rude person called me a âbald personâ - but I would definitely take offence if they called me a âbald c***â !
Unless the C word was âCootâ , which I wouldnât object to!
Dear Benny Hill, miss the fun shows he made.
I was just thinking how awful he was especially in this clip !
Humour has changed what we used to find funny .
Remember all those terrible carry on films and Till Death is do part .
Not to mention child abuse in Billy Bunter .
Maybe Iâm more âwokeâ now .
So what do you call them for goodness sake? Hairless? Smooth Scalped? Follicle challenged?
It seems that the police are not considered to do their job properlyâŠnot surprising when witnesses are not allowed to give a realistic description of the person they saw committing a crime!