Trump’s law suits are failing with monotonous regularity - usually from “lack of evidence”, i.e. Trump and his chumps lied …
Even after Joe Biden secured victory in the US presidential election on Saturday, Donald Trump has continued to dispute the result and vowed to keep filing lawsuits despite already seeing a run of losses in the courts.
Mr Trump’s legal claims have been met with scepticism, with judges noting a lack of evidence for the president’s allegations of fraud and irregularities.
in Michigan, Georgia and Nevada, lawsuits either filed or hyped by the campaign were rejected for presenting no serious evidence of the issues they claimed.
Hey, I don’t care who’s in & who isn’t but you don’t go counting chickens until the eggs are hatched.
In the case of the presidentials, there’s a whole lot of eggs left over.
I get that you’re not happy with that but hey!
Blame the crappy system, not the messenger.
Perhaps you should send telegrams to the multitude of foreign leaders that they are wrong in calling Joe Biden, and congratulating him.
Believing anything Trump says is a very big mistake. That’s kinda like believing Hitler when in 1945 he said we can still win. Both men, are/were delusional.
Trump’s imminent departure from the White House makes him vulnerable to lawsuits and investigations
Trump is the subject of 15 inquiries, criminal and civil, by nine federal, state and district agencies into his business and personal finances – these matters are not going away for the soon-to-be former president
From the Indie
Whilst POTUS he is bombproof but as a mere citizen they will be all over him like a rash
Perhaps Biden knows that Trump has been stitched up good and proper…There are plenty of influential people wanted Trump out by any means…Seems Donald was doing his job properly after all…
Without getting involved in the somewhat (at times) heated exchanges on here, doesn’t it seem a bit of an unsatisfactory way of running an election?
After all, they’ve had elections for the POTUS on numerous occasions and should surely have been able to iron out and resolve potential problems with regard to postal votes and official observers by now!!!
It’s the first time they have had a presidential election during Covid. The postal vote system was overwhelmed in the primaries and they apparently tried to improve it for this election. There was criticism of the chaos and claims of voter disenfranchisement. Over here you just stick it in an envelope and nobody kicks up a fuss after the election. This situation was predicted :
Again: I have no skin in this “game” and don’t believe that the outcome will affect the UK in any significant way no matter what the eventual outcome.
What is very obvious to any outsider is the dirty tricks used throughout the process, including and since the last presidential election.
I also agree with one or two other comments about this being a most unsatisfactory way to run such a meaningful election.
Regarding the first paragraph in the quote - why?
If they want to run the risk of looking very foolish, let them - we’re used to world leaders looking foolish.
It’s themselves they affect.
As for Bakerman using Dubya’s congratulations & asking if he would have done so without believing Biden had won, should I really remind Bakerman of Dubya’s major false belief re: Iraq?
Regarding the second paragraph in the quote:
It’s not a case of what you believe, it’s a case of obeying the rules and the law.
Even when something appears certain, without ALL the information necessary to make a certainty of the conclusion making a definite announcement of the outcome is a lie.
It is dishonest.
That is why the USA’s General Services Administration hasn’t yet called a definite result - not for any other reason; as a federal agency the GSA has a duty to the people of the USA to provide facts and (at the time of writing) those facts are inconclusive.
Like it or not, they are inconclusive.
I get that some devout Democrats won’t like that & will want to say “but we’ve won” - but tough; blame your own systems and not those pointing out the rules.
I get too that some devout Republicans won’t like the way it’s looking as Biden does seem to have won, but again stick to the rules; wait and see - and if any significant outcome-changing rule-breaking is proven, that is the time to complain.
I find it interesting that Biden is so desperate to have won that he is “considering” suing the GSA for not stating the winner soon enough!
Well I’m sorry Mr. Biden but that’s the rules for you.
Any you said that every vote must be counted.
Votes that were created after the election and those from dead people and people that don’t live the county where the votes were made, plus the mysterious volumes of Biden only ballot boxes that appeared on 4th November and the number of mail-in Trump ballot boxes thrown into ditches and bins before the count.
When a top DoJ voter fraud investigator quits as soon as the Attorney General authorises an investigation into voter fraud it’s not too difficult to work out what’s going on.
Not on this scale - you might want to google up which parties favour mail-in ballots and which don’t while your at it, Vlad. Then google up democracy and see if you still agree with it.
It’s pretty easy to see why the left favour the easiest way to commit fraud.
:!: