Of course she can ā¦ but she loses professional credibility with me when, apparently, exposure of her overblown mammaries serves to ātitillateā sad old men ā¦
If you donāt want to be titillated Omah just donāt watch!
I am sending blindfolds to all men who donāt want to reminded that without breasts most of you would have died of starvation, as babies!
She is a TV presenter. What in your opinion gives a TV presenter credibilty? Perhaps the quality of going unnoticed and having an inability to capture the viewerās attention is what you think makes a good TV presenter.
Television is entertainment. If you want purely informative and educational programmes, the Open University would probably suit you better.
I was thinking of some of the OU programmes they used to put on BBC 2, years ago. They were informative, no doubt, to listeners initiated in the relevant subject, but my God were they boring to anyone else.
Sheās such a ā TEASEā!!!..she must know sheād get a few hot under the collar, plus she probably likes all the ā tittle tattleā they are creating!..ā¦in the mediaā¦
Itās her way of producing good viewing figures, but would her programmes be just as interesting without all that cleavage? Probably yes, because she knows her subject. Others serve up good programmes too, such as Janina Ramirez, Alice Roberts and Raksha Dave to name a few. Good research, knowing the subject combined with good camera work make their type of programmes both interesting and informative and that is what keeps me watching.