Yet the US ranks very low in terms of a free, balanced democracy. The billionaire Ellison (and friend of Trump) now owns most of the broadcast media. The politicians are bought by billionaire money or foreign influencer money. Money determines elections. If people in the US cannot see how corrupt, how bent to the influence of a limited few, how it does not work for the ordinary people - then that explains why it is such a sorry excuse for democracy.
Oh, and its getting worse in the US. Which is why we must applaud the efforts to curtail the influence of money in UK politics.
There is certainly some serious discussions and decisions around the internet and social media with regards to politics. Iâve skipped that (for now) because it is beyond the current issues with GBNews.
Please provide evidence for this claim.
For sure, the tech billionaires definitely influence searches, streams, social media and all the rest. I trust we all take a very sceptical view of the info we are pushed. Iâve seen stuff youâve shared that perhaps you might have done a quick simple check on beforehand.
Hence the need to curtail the ability to buy influence and buy elections and buy politicians. Thanks for agreeing with that key point.
I am interested in what you mean by âalmost every countryâ. My own view would be that countries that place strong limits of buying influence might be such countries. Perhaps Canada, Belgium, South Korea are examples.
Iâve never seen or heard of the in the bill of rights.
Itâs a free economy.and they get to say what they want.
The rest is yadie yasie yadie. Nothing about freedom of other countries that are as equal to Americans freedoms.
Check the ownership of other countries, same thing. Deflecting
Yup, done that check. Many countries have billionaire owners of one or two broadcast channels, while the rest remain otherwise owned. No country, aside from the US and Russia and North Korea, has a single ownership of the majority of broadcast operations. Iâm amazed that you are not worried about this.