It was more traumatic for the woman she killed.
2 Likes
For all the dickering back and forth one fact seems to be largely overlooked …
The County Council can find no record of this pavement been legally designated a shared pathway …
Irrespective of what signs are erected there now.
The relevance here is not who sees a sign or not or abides by it or not … …
This particular pavement , at 2.4 metres wide, is too narrow to comply with the width that legislation stipulates (at least 3 metres, if not 4.5) is needed for two pathway users to pass each other without danger to themselves or each other.
2 Likes
You were there?
1 Like
The pavement didn’t push Celia Ward off her bicycle.
1 Like
it wasn’t a shared path - that’s why there is no evidence. The plaintiff was stitched up by the pro-cycling brigade
1 Like
It’s not a piddling contest Omah to see who suffered most … one poor woman is dead, rather tragically … another two have had their lives blighted.
I’m not expressing an “expert” opinion … 
Plaintiff?
I meant the accused/convicted
Yes, it is, rather … 
I agree.
So, explain the stitch-up … 
Neither did Auriol Grey! The elderly lady cyclist fell.
1 Like
She was pushed.
By whom?
The accused/convicted.
A disabled woman behind bars for 3 years for swearing at someone who lost control of her bicycle, all because there is a pro-cycling agenda among the top brass in this country.
That’s not an explanation.
there’s absolutely no evidence she was pushed
2 Likes
There is … you haven’t been allowed to see it.
1 Like